An Overview of FEMA (Foreign Exchange Management Act), 1999

The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) holds an important place in the legal system of India, affecting the regulation of foreign exchange and transactions. Its roots go back to the early 1990s when economic reforms were gaining momentum in the country. Before the advent of FEMA, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) was in place, but it was considered harsh and inconsistent with the changing economic landscape.

In response to the urgent need for a more flexible and contemporary regulatory framework, FEMA was enacted in 1999 to replace FERA. The primary objective was to streamline and liberalize foreign exchange controls, aligning them with growing global economic trends. This marked a significant shift towards a more open and market-oriented approach.

FEMA acts as a custodian to effectively facilitate and regulate India’s foreign trade and payments. The enactment of this law was a strategic move to adapt to the emerging international economic landscape, where globalization was becoming a defining feature. The Act recognizes the importance of foreign exchange reserves and aims to ensure their orderly increase and maintenance.

One of the fundamental aspects of FEMA is its response to economic changes. This law provides the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with wide powers to manage and regulate foreign exchange. RBI plays a vital role in implementing FEMA, ensuring the smooth conduct of capital and current account transactions. This regulatory authority allows a dynamic response to economic challenges and opportunities while fostering a more adaptable financial environment.

Evaluation of FEMA

The change from the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) to the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) marks a significant change in India’s approach to handling foreign exchange. FERA, enacted in 1973, was intended to regulate foreign payments and optimize the use of foreign currency within the country. However, emerging economic dynamics demanded a more adaptive and liberal framework, leading to the emergence of FEMA in 1999.

FERA was launched during a period when India faced challenges related to low foreign exchange reserves. The primary objective was to regulate and control foreign payments to ensure prudent utilization of limited foreign exchange resources. The regulatory environment established by FERA was characterized by strict controls, with violations considered criminal offenses that often resulted in imprisonment.

As the global economy developed, India found itself in a more stable position with substantial foreign exchange reserves. The need for a more flexible and development-oriented framework became clear. FERA’s rigid and controlled regime was deemed unsuitable for the changing environment, prompting the Indian government to seek more progressive and adaptable solutions.

In response to these needs, FEMA was enacted in 1999 to replace FERA. The transition from FERA to FEMA marked a significant departure from the stringent controls of the past toward a more dynamic and development-focused approach. FEMA’s goal is to create a regulatory framework that addresses the contemporary economic landscape and promotes economic growth and international trade.

The major aspects of the evolution from FERA to FEMA include:

• Flexibility and Development Orientation: Unlike FERA, which operated within a rigid and controlled regime, FEMA was designed to be more flexible and development-oriented. The emphasis shifted from strict controls to facilitating economic development through foreign trade and investment.
• Adaptability to changing Economic Environment: FERA was implemented during a period of economic challenges when foreign exchange reserves were low. On the other hand, FEMA came into existence at a time when India’s foreign exchange position was more stable. The new law was designed to adapt to the changing economic environment and promote a more open and liberal approach.
• Civil Offenses vs. Criminal Offenses: FERA considered violations to be criminal offenses, often resulting in prison sentences for the individuals involved. In contrast, FEMA introduced a shift toward treating violations as civil offenses, imposing fines and penalties for noncompliance.
• Promotion of Foreign Trade: While FERA focused on regulation and control, FEMA was aimed at promoting foreign trade and simplifying external payments. Its objective was to create a favourable environment for businesses engaged in international transactions.

The evolution from FERA to FEMA represents a significant change in India’s foreign exchange management. This change underlined the government’s commitment to adopt a more open, adaptive and growth-oriented approach in line with the dynamic nature of the global economy. FEMA, with its emphasis on facilitating trade, simplifying external payments and maintaining a healthy foreign exchange market, has become a cornerstone in India’s economic system.

Objectives of FEMA

The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 1999 was introduced with the specific objectives of modernizing and streamlining India’s foreign exchange regulations. Unlike its predecessor, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), FEMA sought to adapt to the changing economic landscape and facilitate a more favourable environment for international trade and investment. The major objectives of FEMA are given below:

• Reforms and amendments in Foreign Exchange Laws: FEMA was enacted to replace the old FERA and bring comprehensive reforms in the foreign exchange laws. Its objective was to create a modern legal framework consistent with contemporary economic needs.
• Simplification and Facilitation of External Trade and Payments: A primary goal of FEMA was to simplify and ease the processes related to external trade and payments. The purpose of this Act is to remove bureaucratic barriers, making it more convenient for businesses engaged in international transactions.
• Systematic Development of a Healthy Foreign Exchange Market: FEMA sought to promote the organized development and maintenance of a strong foreign exchange market in India. This included measures to ensure transparency, efficiency and fair dealing within the foreign exchange market.
• Removing disparities in Payment: The purpose of this Act is to remove disparities in payment by establishing a more equitable system. It sought to create a level playing field for all entities involved in forex transactions.
• Control and Regulation of Employment, Business and Investment of Non-Residents: FEMA provided powers to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Central Government to control and direct the employment, business and investment activities of non-residents. Its objective was to ensure that such activities were consistent with the overall economic interests of the country.
• Effective Utilization of Foreign Exchange Resources: FEMA envisages effective utilization of foreign exchange resources for the benefit of the nation. Its objective was to create a balance between the inflow and outflow of foreign exchange, ensuring prudent management of foreign exchange reserves.

These objectives collectively represent a departure from the restrictive and regulatory nature of FERA. FEMA took a more forward-looking approach, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that not only addresses the challenges of the times but also lays the foundation for a more dynamic and globally integrated economy.

Features of FEMA

FEMA has 49 sections divided into 7 chapters, it has several features that distinguish it from its predecessor. These features were designed to align with the changing economic landscape and promote a more liberalized and growth-focused approach. Some notable features of FEMA include:

• Not applicable to Indian citizens residing outside India: FEMA does not apply to Indian citizens residing outside India unless their stay in India exceeds 182 days in the previous financial year. This provision ensures that Indian citizens abroad are not unnecessarily burdened with FEMA rules.
• Power of the Central Government to impose sanctions: Under FEMA, the Central Government has the power to impose sanctions and monitor payments, foreign exchange transactions and deals involving foreign securities from any person outside India.
• Classification of transactions into current and capital accounts: FEMA categorizes transactions into current and capital accounts, each subject to specific rules. This classification helps to effectively manage different types of transactions based on their nature and impact on the economy.
• Specific sectors requiring permission from the RBI or the government to hold foreign currency: FEMA specifies the sectors where specific permission is required from the RBI or the government to hold foreign currency. This ensures a controlled and regulated approach to certain foreign exchange holdings.
• Applicability across India: FEMA applies to the entire geographical expanse of India, ensuring a uniform regulatory framework across the country.
• Three categories are covered for regulation: FEMA covers three categories – individuals resident in India, individuals resident outside India and foreign exchange. Each category is dealt with separately, ensuring targeted regulation based on residence and the currency involved.

The inclusion of these features is a departure from the stringent provisions of FERA, reflecting a more contemporary and adaptable approach to foreign exchange management in India.

Who does FEMA apply to?

FEMA’s applicability is broad and includes a variety of entities and individuals involved in various capacities. The Act recognizes three main categories and tackles each category separately:

• Persons: For FEMA, a person includes individuals, Hindu Undivided Families (HUF), companies, firms, associations of persons, artificial juridical persons and agencies, offices or branches owned or controlled by such persons.
• An individual resident in India: An individual resident in India for more than 182 days during the previous financial year is considered a resident in India. However, some exceptions exist, such as persons travelling abroad for employment or business and persons visiting India for similar purposes.
• Individuals resident outside India: This category includes individuals or entities who are not residents of India. This includes foreign nationals, companies or institutions that have no residential connection with India.

Clear delineation of these categories helps in targeted regulation based on residence and facilitates effective forex management.

Important provisions in FEMA

FEMA contains significant provisions that form the backbone of its regulatory framework. Some important provisions in FEMA are given below:

• Authorized Person (Section 2(c)): Section 2(c) defines an authorized person as an entity authorized by the RBI to deal in foreign currency or foreign securities. This includes authorized dealers, money changers, offshore banking units and other institutions authorized under section 10(1) of FEMA.
• Transactions in Foreign Exchange (Section 3): Section 3 of FEMA establishes that transactions in foreign exchange should be carried out only through authorized persons. This includes authorized banks and financial institutions. This section emphasizes the importance of adhering to the regulatory framework and conducting foreign exchange transactions within the prescribed channels.
• Power of RBI to Compound Violations (Section 9): Section 9 provides the RBI with the power to compound violations of FEMA. Compounding refers to the process of compounding crimes by payment of monetary penalty. This section provides a mechanism to resolve certain breaches without resorting to lengthy legal proceedings, promoting more efficient resolution of non-compliance issues.
• Authorization and powers of the Reserve Bank (Section 10): Section 10 empowers the Reserve Bank of India to authorize any person to deal in foreign exchange or foreign securities. The authorization is subject to rules, and the RBI can cancel it if the public interest demands, or if the authorized person fails to comply with the conditions.
• Export of goods and services (Section 7): Section 7 states that every exporter of goods and services must provide to the Reserve Bank a declaration or statement containing accurate details including the full export value. This provision ensures transparency in export transactions and facilitates the realization of export proceeds.
• Adjudication and Appeals (Section 16-18): Section 16-18 outlines the adjudication process, appeals to the Special Director (Appeals) and the establishment of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange. These provisions ensure a fair and efficient mechanism to address violations and appeals.
• Power of search, seizure etc. (Section 37): Section 37 empowers the Director of Enforcement and other designated officers to investigate violations through search and seizure, if necessary. The powers conferred are similar to those exercised by Income Tax officers under the Income Tax Act, of 1961.

These provisions collectively contribute to FEMA’s effectiveness in regulating foreign exchange transactions and maintaining the integrity of the financial system.

With provisions prohibiting transactions in Foreign Currency

FEMA imposes certain restrictions on transactions in foreign currency, and these restrictions are supported by specific provisions within the Act. It is important for institutions and individuals engaged in foreign exchange transactions to understand these restrictions. Some of the key restrictions and provisions include:

• Regulation of current account transactions (Section 5): Section 5 empowers the Central Government to impose restrictions on current account transactions in consultation with the Reserve Bank. These restrictions have been imposed to maintain the stability and integrity of the country’s financial system.
• Transactions in foreign currency, etc. (Section 3): Section 3 prohibits transactions in foreign currency or foreign securities except by an authorized person. Any person violating this provision will be liable to punishment.
• Export of goods and services (Section 7): While Section 7 mandates the declaration of accurate details by exporters, non-compliance with this provision may result in a penalty. It ensures proper documentation and reporting of export transactions.
• Transactions in Capital Account (Section 6): Section 6 states that capital account transactions including debt instruments require authorization from authorized persons. The Reserve Bank may, in consultation with the Central Government, specify the transactions permitted, prescribe limits and impose conditions. Exceptions are provided for amortization-related payments, and the RBI has the authority to regulate establishments by non-residents in India.
• Power to prohibit transactions in certain cases (Section 9): Section 9 empowers the Central Government to prohibit any person from entering into any transaction involving foreign exchange or foreign security if it is satisfied that such transaction would be detrimental to the interests of the country.

These restrictions and provisions are designed to strike a balance between facilitating foreign currency transactions and preventing activities that undermine the economic stability and security of the nation.

Violations and Penalties under FEMA

FEMA prescribes penalties for violations to ensure compliance with its provisions. Violations may include violations of rules relating to foreign exchange transactions, transactions in foreign securities and other specified activities. Punishments are classified depending on the nature and seriousness of the violation. Some of the major violations and associated penalties include:

• Penalties for Violations: Persons violating the Foreign Exchange Management Act are subject to penalties. The fine may be up to three times the amount involved, or up to Rs two lakh where the amount cannot be determined. Repeat violations may result in additional daily penalties.
• Penalty for exceeding the limit (Section 13A): Receiving foreign exchange or property abroad over the limit is punishable with a fine up to three times the amount involved and confiscation of the equivalent value in India. Can be prosecuted and face imprisonment for up to five years with a fine.
• Enforcement of orders of Adjudicating Authority (Section 14): Failure to pay the fine within 90 days is punishable by civil imprisonment. If the defaulter attempts to obstruct collection of the fine or has the means but refuses to pay then arrest and detention may result.
• Custody and Release (Section 14): The adjudicating authority may order confiscation of currency, securities or property relating to the contravention. Detention in civil prison can last up to three years for large amounts and six months for small amounts. Release is possible upon payment of dues.
• Disposal of contravention (Section 15): Disposal of contravention under Section 13 can be done within 180 days from the date of application. Compounding eliminates further legal proceedings against the person for the specific violation.
• Power to recover dues (Section 14A): Enforcement officers can recover penalty dues following the same procedures as income tax officers. The adjudicating authority can authorize any officer to collect penalties from the defaulters.

These penalties are designed to act as a deterrent and encourage compliance with the provisions of FEMA. The severity of the fine reflects the seriousness of the violation and emphasizes the importance of adhering to the established regulatory framework.

Must Read:

• Know About EPFO: History, Structure, Work and Benefits
• What is the Role of Agriculture in the Indian Economy?